Chapter 5 - Fanzine Production and Distribution
Content
The diversity of content is one of the most striking features of fanzines. Whilst, as I noted in my introduction, there is a perception that fanzines deal with one particular band or personality, the majority of fanzines are exactly the opposite of this. In fact, the majority of music fanzines do not even limit themselves to just covering a variety of music. It is commonplace for a fanzine to also include articles on films, books, short stories and pieces on the zine producer's life. Art and drawings are also an important part of many fanzines.
As one example of the
variety of content present in fanzines, I will now have a brief discussion
of issue six of Astrochimps, produced by Simon Hampson. The zine
starts with an introductory paragraph, announcing this as "the latin
issue" of Astrochimps. There then follows on the next two pages
several lists that Simon has put together, ranging from "my favourite
words, phrases or others" to his favourite albums and concerts of 1999.
There are then a number of music reviews, in the middle of which is placed
a piece on the different colours of denim available and television personality
Rolf Harris. After this are four pages of articles on seemingly random topics,
following which are pages of cartoons by a friend of Simon's, with more
music reviews and pieces on television personalities placed between them.
|
Pages
two and three of issue six, 'the latin issue', of Astrochimps
|
![]() |
What may seem to be a random assortment of articles is however united by each piece being what Simon himself chooses to write about. Without an editorial board or any necessity to respond to the demands of the market, fanzines have an almost complete freedom to print whatever the producer wants to put in their own publication.
This lack of constraints upon the writer is the biggest determinant of fanzine content. Commercial magazines have to be aware of many factors; as well as the magazine editors and publishers and the demands of the market, also their competition and advertisers. Articles must primarily be written with their audience in mind. The majority of fanzines have no conception of 'audience' (in the traditional sense), and, of those that do, an even more limited number write with the audience in mind. The content of fanzines is primarily prompted from what the writer themselves is interested in; it is merely hoped that after the fanzine has been printed, there will be a significant amount of other people sharing the same interests that would be interested in a publication covering them.
These comments must however be qualified. Firstly, fanzines are very well aware of other similar publications available. There is rarely a sense of competition, however. Instead, a feeling of community between similar publications is more prevalent. Indeed, it is common for a number of fanzine publications to feature articles on a small number of bands, particularly those that are willing to give interviews and have a general interest in gaining publicity from fanzines. There are also a number of bands whose following seems particularly suited to the creation of fanzines, leading to a large amount of fanzines focused on one particular act, whilst many other bands are largely ignored. This is, in part, a reflection of the bias of fanzine writers being, as previously noted, predominantly "white, middle class and educated" (Mitchell online reference) - there are very few articles or fanzines, for instance, about hip hop or rap. It must however be noted that some fanzine writers do recognise this discrepancy; as one writer comments, "how many Manic Street Preachers zines does the world need?" (response to But First The News questionnaire)
Secondly, a limited amount of fanzines have become established to such a point that it is necessary for them to regulate their content in order to continue their high readerships. It is interesting that the two biggest music zines that I have found whilst doing this research, the American Maximum Rock and Roll and the British Fracture are both punk orientated. Both of these fanzines have been able to attain high readerships and widespread distribution through a successful sense of image; if they were to change their content by, for instance, including articles on pop bands or acts signed to major labels, this image would be greatly damaged, with a resultant drop in readership. Of course, this is entirely hypothetical, as the people responsible for both fanzines are entirely committed to their current, purely punk, content, but it does illustrate how it is at times necessary for even a fanzine to be self-regulatory.
There is also one other thing that has an impact upon fanzine content; commercial magazines. It is difficult to say whether commercial magazines are in direct competition with fanzines; their contents often differ considerably, with fanzines providing coverage of "stuff that would normally be ignored" (response to P'tahk questionnaire). However, the content of commercial music magazines, and what is perceived as a lack in it, has a strong influence on fanzines. Bands not getting mentioned in commercial music magazines, whether for reasons of space or because of their limited appeal, is the reason that, firstly, many people are motivated to start their own publication, and secondly, these fanzines are able to continue because of other people wanting this information that is unavailable elsewhere. As Xana Charnock of The IndiePendent writes, "[I] was fed up of not finding any of the gigs I went to reviewed in the weeklies" (response to questionnaire). Therefore, if the mainstream and professional press won't mention what you're interested in, the only way that such coverage can be ensured is if you do it yourself.
Interestingly however, the bands covered in The IndiePendent include some of the most commercial that are featured in any of the fanzines that I obtained. Amongst interviews and reviews with lesser known bands are pieces on Travis and Coldplay, two bands that have had several singles in the music charts and which are featured by the mainstream press on a regular basis. The IndiePendent does however hope to provide a different perspective on the bands from a fan's view; Xana asserts that, in regard to the mainstream and fanzines, "both have their pros and cons, and there is a place for both" (response to questionnaire). The underlying point here is that even where the commercial press and small scale fanzines share the same subject matter in content, there is room for both types of publication, and different information can be gained from each.
It should also be mentioned that the content of some fanzines have particular content that could never truly be reproduced in any and mainstream magazine. Hobble Oblong, for example, is a collection of photocopied questionnaires filled in by the members of various bands. The questions covered are somewhat more eccentric than those usually asked to such personalities, such as "what do you think about mules?" "Sum up your political stance in one word" and, perhaps most bizarrely, "Draw a shark wearing a fancy hat". However, the questionnaires do provide a certain insight into the personalities involved, and make Hobble Oblong an entirely unique publication.
Another example of an entirely different kind is Veronica, which combines music articles with pieces on feminist and liberal politics. One two-page spread pastiches a script from Australian soap opera Neighbours, placing between the lines information about the state of Aborigines and Australia's treatment of them.
Format
There are a number of different presentation formats available to fanzines. Although some are A4, the majority of them use an A5 size to provide the fanzine with greater bulk. Some also utilise colour covers in order to make themselves stand out more from the primarily black and white photocopied covers.
The motivation behind the fanzine's publication is the main determinant of its format. Some take the form of newsletters; Fifth Season, for example, is composed of one two-sided sheet of A4 and provides CD reviews and gig listings. Others, which are intended to provide greater coverage of a cultural group, such as Maximum Rock and Roll, Fracture and Dogprint, run to 160, 104 and 96 A4 pages respectively. The number of pages can however be misleading when dealing with fanzines due to the many possibilities of layout. Pop Art, for instance, has between five and seven reviews on most of its 36 pages, being much more densely packed with information than various other fanzines.
Of course, some fanzines are not interested in 'information'; some fanzines are based entirely around humour. Planet Boo is four A5 sides of humorous articles - it is not intended to function as news, but rather as pure entertainment.
Production Methods
The original punk fanzines had one of the most distinctive designs ever produced in any area of publishing; their "cut and paste" layout appropriated from mainstream media but also replaced traditional use of typefaces and paragraphs either created with typewriters or simply handwritten and stuck directly onto the page of the zine.
However, many other types of design exist for fanzines, especially in the current age of readily available desktop publishing software.
DTP is making an impact on fanzine production. As the technology becomes increasingly within everyone's reach, a larger number of fanzines are embracing its opportunities to create their own publications. However, the original concept of putting a zine together with your bare hands, using as little technological assistance (with the exception of photocopiers) is still of great importance within zine culture.
Of all the music zines that I looked at during my research, about half used cut and paste techniques in their production as opposed to DTP or being word processed. However, those which have been created entirely with computers still have important distinctions from commercial magazines.
Firstly, it is generally a financial necessity for fanzines to be reproduced with photocopiers as the cheapest way to copy small runs of publications. This does of course have an impact on the appearance of them, particularly on the quality of photographs and, with colour photocopying being significantly more expensive, often limits the publication to black and white. There are however a few notable exceptions to this; of the fanzines I surveyed, three used colour although each in quite different ways. Firstly, Juicy, although printed in monochrome, alternates white and yellow sheets to create an unusual and distinctive effect. But First The News is unique in giving people ordering the fanzine a choice between paying one pound for the black and white version, and one pound fifty for the colour version. This was apparently a decision made when the first issue was being created and many of the pictures just looked like a "puddle of black ink" without colour (response to questionnaire). However, the choice is still left open to the person ordering it as to whether they want to pay an extra fifty pence to get comprehensible images. Finally, Angels Under Starlight has another, very different, approach; each one is coloured in by hand with felt tip pens.
It is also noticeable that many of the DTP produced zines do not want to make themselves look commercially slick. Even though actual typewriters have played no part in the production of a zine, typefaces such as courier are often used to give the impression that the fanzine has been produced in the same way that zines originally were.
Unsurprisingly, there is a connection between the zines that are consciously constructed as 'unprofessional' (in the best sense of the word) and the belief that commercial magazines and the mainstream music industry is insufficient in some way.
Maximum Rock and Roll is quite possibly the largest fanzine in the world. Its circulation is around 10,000 and, as of February 2001, had put out 213 issues. However, despite it changing form and growing (in both circulation and size; issue 213 was made up of 160 A4 pages) since Maximum Rock and Roll's inception in the late 1970s, it still strives to contain as much of its original character as possible. As one of the editors, Michael Thorn, states, "MRR was started to cover the music that no one else wanted to touch - punk". The image and status of punk has changed a lot over the last twenty years, but Maximum Rock and Roll tries to maintain its position of importance within the punk scene by staying non-profit and independent. It furthermore reinforces this through its design; whilst it is necessary for the zine to be "readable, without it being too sterile looking", it is also necessary for "making it look "punk"" to be in the editors' minds whilst working on the layout (response to questionnaire). Remaining true to punk values is one thing, but just as important is representing the zine's ideology in its presentation in order to convince readers of its authenticity.
However, as prized as the idea of cut and paste and the original presentation of fanzines is, home computer technology is having more and more of an impact upon fanzine production, with possibly devastating results, as will be looked at more deeply in my chapter related to the growth of the ezine. Although I have here talked about desktop publishing, it should however also be noted that is more common for fanzines to use simpler word processing templates. This is becoming so commonplace that publications "put together in Microsoft Word and printed A4 on a colour printer" can be described as being "the future of self-published fanzines" (Diskant Zine Reviews, http://www.diskant.net/zine/reviews/zinerevs.html).
It should also however
be noted that some fanzines publishers do utilise DTP to a far greater extent
to create pages that are as carefully laid out as anything from a commercial
magazine. This is not restricted to fanzines dedicated to more mainstream
music either; the fanzine Dogprint, for example, covers a range of
independent and generally punk releases, but its presentation is a long
way away from the original cut and paste aesthetic. This can be seen from
the cover and double spread from issue ten shown below. The one concession
made here to the traditional form of the fanzine is the use of a typeface
that mimics that of a typewriter, even though the technology used in producing
the publication was far more advanced.
![]() |
![]() |
The Dislike of Categorisation and Organisation
As the presence of a clear order and regimentation of content is a recognisable feature of mainstream magazines, it follows that many fanzines, in order to make themselves recognisably stand out from such constraints, are much more anarchic in layout and presentation. As Hugh Platt of The Paranoid Endjinn states, "I don't want to put all the album reviews together, or all the live reviews, or interviews, as keeping it "choppy" makes it interesting" (response to questionnaire).
However, in contrast to this, Hugh does state that he prefers "a certain format for album reviews, as well as how it deals with pictures".
However, when layout is deliberately made non-standard in this way, what suffers is often, in the words of Patrick Gray of Planet Boo, "legibility. Less is more - some writers tend to 'cram' pages and they end up looking like a serial killer's manifesto". However, this is something to be learnt by a fanzine producer through experience, and even then, ease of reading may not be high on the writer's priorities.
As an example
of this, the text in Angels Under Starlight is primarily in the handwriting
of Helen, the zine producer. Although some of the pages would be much easier
to read if they were typed and laid out, the character of the zine is in many
ways reliant upon Helen's personally written articles.
![]() |
Cover and page five of Angels Under Starlight issue two featuring hand-drawn pictures, hand written articles, and personally coloured-in cover. |
Distribution
The area of distribution is where the majority of fanzines experience the most problems. Whilst music magazines exist in a very competitive environment (as can be seen from the demise of Melody Maker), they can at least secure widespread distribution and therefore be allowed to display themselves on the market, where it can be hoped that if a publication is of a significant quality, it will prosper. Conversely, there are very few places interested in selling or promoting fanzines.
Partly this is a result of the inherent diversity of fanzines; whilst some feature well written and original articles, others can offer little more than reprints of older pieces of work. As well of this, there is also a very significant problem in the perception of fanzines by both retail outlets and consumers. Both of these groups can have a view of fanzines as being badly produced publications, offering at most a small amount of novelty value. Retailers are therefore unwilling to give shelf space to something of variable quality that might not sell.
There are however exceptions to this. Tower Records and various independent music shops do stock fanzines. In the case of Tower Records, their sale of fanzines is overseen by a particularly enthusiastic employee. Tower sells in excess of 500 different fanzines through its outlets, and is able to justify this though an economy of scale. Although profit from zine sales is minimal in comparison to its other products, the amount of profit from this area reached two million American dollars some time ago (Duncombe 1997: 165).
However, this method of distribution has two distinct drawbacks. Firstly, Tower can select which fanzines they wish to carry, and whilst bringing a lot of American zines to Britain, do not have nearly so many British ones. Although an established zine such as Maximum Rock and Roll can be purchased from this outlet, many smaller and/or British fanzines cannot be displayed in this way. Secondly, even if all fanzines were to be available in this way, it would defeat the process of interaction that has been implicit in fanzines since their inception. Therefore, instead of writing to a zine and asking the producer for a copy, the consumer would simply go to Tower and buy one, removing the link to the publication's creator.
A number of independent music shops also sell fanzines, but this is by its nature far less centralised. These music shops often only stock those music fanzines that are produced locally and have been brought into the shop by the producer, and although adequate for promoting the zine on a local basis, cannot make the zine available in any wider areas.
It has been a central feature since the origination of fanzines that they exist to be swapped and exchanged between fanzine writers. However, due to fanzines being the main way for people to become informed about fanzines, something of a 'closed circle' has been created. There is limited scope for people outside of fanzine production to become aware of these publications, no matter how suited they may be to their interests.
One thing that seems to be lacking is any sort of mass review zine. Before suffering large losses, Factsheet Five was an American review zine on a huge scale. By issue 44 in the summer of 1991, its circulation was over 10,000 and included 1,259 reviews of fanzines. Factsheet Five was also more readily available than any of the zines it covered, particularly during its latter years when, under a new editor, it expanded its print run to 16,000 copies and arranged distribution through large scale bookshop chains such as Barnes & Noble and Tower Books (Duncombe 1997: 157).
There seems to be no equivalent, even on a smaller scale, in British fanzine culture. Almost all fanzines do however feature reviews of other fanzines to a greater or lesser amount. Pop Art has a particularly high level of reviews, with 40 fanzines reviewed along with each one's contact and price details. However, someone would need to become aware of and get hold of one of these fanzines in order to become aware of other ones, which is problematic considering the small amount of outlets where fanzines can be obtained.
The majority of promotion and distribution work undertaken by fanzine writers entails the sending of flyers to as many people as possible, and which can also be included in other people's fanzines. Fanzines and flyers are also taken directly to potential buyers at music concerts, therefore providing a much greater interaction between consumer and producer than is possible for the mainstream media. A small number of fanzines also utilise advertisements in the mainstream music media such as the NME and Kerrang!, in variance with Mike Gunderloy's comment about how advertising your fanzine costs too much for too little of an effect.
A small minority of fanzines are however able to arrange wider distribution, albeit in a very different way from how this works for the mainstream media. Fracture, for example, is of a high enough circulation and has sufficient advertisers that it is able to get around a thousand copies sent to music shops and venues around Europe, which is made significantly easier in the case of Fracture, as no money needs to change hands for a free zine.
Perhaps the most widely available source of fanzine reviews is, curiously enough, the teletext page UFO - Unidentified Fanzines Observed. This can be found in a section of teletext which offers music reviews and also gives details and reviews of fanzines. This sort of highlighting of interesting fanzines could also be done in any number of commercial magazines, but as it is, mentions of fanzines in the mainstream press are generally reserved to the classified advertisements pages, where individual fanzine writers can place adverts to draw attention to themselves from the readers of mainstream publications.
Advertising
While the concept of advertising in fanzines clearly carries with it echoes of the debate as to how independent zines should be and whether they can be trusted as authentic publications if they are backed by commercial advertising revenue, some fanzines would not be able to exist without it. As Steve Russell of P'tahk says, "I regularly send letters to record companies whinging that they should advertise so that I can afford to print more copies." Although P'tahk's current circulation is around 600, as a free zine it is to be wondered how long it can continue to grow without the aid of the advertisers that Steve wants to acquire. Fanzines such as Fracture and Maximum Rock and Roll would certainly have been unable to reach their current size without significant support from advertisers. In the case of these publications, their advertising is placed by small, independent record labels - the music industry equivalent to fanzines - therefore supporting the idea of collective action by commercial 'outsiders'.
Copyright
Copyright
is an issue largely ignored in the area of fanzines. In part this is due to
a less than respectful attitude to the mainstream press; fanzine writers do
not feel that they are doing anything wrong if they reproduce an article from
the NME without permission. Of course, as previously discussed, they
would perhaps not want to, but more through the dislike of fanzine writers
seeing other merely copying the mainstream instead of creating something original,
rather than because of any fear of repercussions. The copyright and intellectual
property rights that are however fully respected are those of anyone directly
involved with fanzines. Almost all fanzines include a list of contributors
and friends who helped out in any way during the making of the publication.
Fanzine Questionnaire |
List of Fanzines Researched |